Benutzer
What are the exceptions and management responses in the report?
Virtual Information Security Officer
What are the exceptions and management responses in the report?
The SOC 2 Type II report for Azure, Dynamics 365, and Online Services identifies two key exceptions, along with the management's responses to these issues:
What are the exceptions and management responses in the report?
The SOC 2 Type II report for Azure, Dynamics 365, and Online Services identifies several key exceptions, along with management's responses to these issues:
Control ID OA - 15: This control pertains to the rotation of passwords for Azure network devices. The exception noted was that 28 out of 39 sampled network devices had not had their passwords rotated as per the defined cadence in the documented procedures. Management's response emphasized their commitment to implementing a process for rotating passwords, monitoring, detecting, and remediating issues that cause failures in the automated workflow for password rotation. They also noted that the affected accounts could only be accessed when the central authentication system is down, and thus, deemed that there was no risk as a result of this exception【20†source】.
Control ID OA - 20: This control involves generating alerts when a break-glass account is used to access a production subscription. The exception noted was that for two of four production domains containing break-glass accounts, the configuration for alert generation was not in place for a portion of the period from April 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022. Management reviewed access logs for the impacted period and verified that break-glass usage was limited and monitored. They confirmed that for one of the domains, break-glass usage was limited and for the other, there were no instances of break-glass access. Management also stated that they have multiple controls in place to address the risk of unauthorized changes to production through break-glass access, and that alerting for these domains is now enabled【21†source】.
Control ID DS - 1: This control deals with the secure storage and periodic rotation of cryptographic certificates, keys, and customer access keys used for communication between Azure services and other internal components. The exception was that two of 26 sampled secrets were not rotated as per the defined secret rotation cadence. Management responded by either deleting the secret or rotating the password of the secret, ensuring access is restricted to authorized personnel and stored in an encrypted format. They also conducted a review over all their secrets and rotated them as needed【22†source】.
Control ID LA - 7: This control relates to enforcing quotas on Azure services as configured by service administrators to prevent availability-related issues. The exception noted was that quota restrictions for two of 19 sampled offerings were not configured as per the defined limits. Management responded that the quota restrictions were not functioning as expected due to a bug, which has since been resolved. They also mentioned that there were no service outages or capacity issues with the offerings caused by the bug and that monitoring mechanisms are in place to detect if resources cannot be created due to capacity constraints. As such, management deemed there was no risk as a result of this exception【23†source】.
These responses demonstrate management's commitment to addressing identified exceptions and maintaining the integrity and security of their services.
What are the listed complementary user entity controls?
The SOC 2 Type II report for Azure, Dynamics 365, and Online Services outlines a comprehensive list of complementary user entity controls that customers are responsible for implementing. These responsibilities are assumed by Microsoft to be in place but are not required to meet the criteria of the report. Customers and other interested parties should ensure they have established sufficient controls in these areas: