Perovskite Solar Cell Alternatives

Utilisateur

ペロブスカイト太陽電池に使用するspiro-OMeTADの代替材料として提案されているものを、可能な限り挙げてください。

Consensus

Here are some alternative materials to spiro-OMeTAD for use in perovskite solar cells:

Spiro[fluorene-9,9′-xanthene] based HTM (X59): Exhibits similar performance to spiro-OMeTAD with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 19.8% (Bi et al., 2016).
Polyfluorene derivatives (TFB and PFB): These have high hole mobility and good processability, potentially outperforming spiro-OMeTAD (Zhu et al., 2014).
Copper iodide (CuI): A promising inorganic hole conductor with a PCE of 6.0% and significantly higher electrical conductivity compared to spiro-OMeTAD (Christians et al., 2014).
Spiro-linked organic small molecules: These are being researched as alternatives to overcome disadvantages such as high synthetic cost and complex synthesis route of spiro-OMeTAD (Gangala & Misra, 2018).
Metallated Macrocyclic Derivatives (MMDs): They offer low-cost, high yield, hydrophobic materials with minimal synthesis steps, showing PCEs around 19% (Reddy et al., 2019).
Spiro-CN-OMeTAD and spiro-PS-OMeTAD: Incorporating Lewis base functionality into spiro-OMeTAD structure for enhanced performance (Xu et al., 2020).
Amorphous Carbazole-Based HTM: Demonstrated PCE of 16.5%, slightly lower than Spiro-OMeTAD, but promising due to low-cost synthesis (Magomedov et al., 2017).

These alternatives highlight the ongoing research and development in finding more cost-effective and efficient materials for perovskite solar cells.

Here are some alternative materials to spiro-OMeTAD for use in perovskite solar cells: 1. **Spiro[fluorene-9,9′-xanthene] based HTM (X59):** Exhibits similar performance to spiro-OMeTAD with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 19.8% [(Bi et al., 2016)](https://consensus.app/papers/facile-synthesized-hole-transporting-material-bi/381352d762715e8294c8fea4752f4b5d/?utm_source=chatgpt). 2. **Polyfluorene derivatives (TFB and PFB):** These have high hole mobility and good processability, potentially outperforming spiro-OMeTAD [(Zhu et al., 2014)](https://consensus.app/papers/polyfluorene-derivatives-high‐performance-organic-zhu/ddcec182f21e525c8563484fc9ee7484/?utm_source=chatgpt). 3. **Copper iodide (CuI):** A promising inorganic hole conductor with a PCE of 6.0% and significantly higher electrical conductivity compared to spiro-OMeTAD [(Christians et al., 2014)](https://consensus.app/papers/hole-conductor-halide-perovskite-cells-improved-christians/e8d8d7f93c4754cb80bffae9a4f497e1/?utm_source=chatgpt). 4. **Spiro-linked organic small molecules:** These are being researched as alternatives to overcome disadvantages such as high synthetic cost and complex synthesis route of spiro-OMeTAD [(Gangala & Misra, 2018)](https://consensus.app/papers/spirolinked-molecules-transport-materials-perovskite-gangala/889c08a92df8537b980c8710e504eff0/?utm_source=chatgpt). 5. **Metallated Macrocyclic Derivatives (MMDs):** They offer low-cost, high yield, hydrophobic materials with minimal synthesis steps, showing PCEs around 19% [(Reddy et al., 2019)](https://consensus.app/papers/metallated-macrocyclic-derivatives-hole-transporting-reddy/7a297199dfd45c7e994682e8c61b308d/?utm_source=chatgpt). 6. **Spiro-CN-OMeTAD and spiro-PS-OMeTAD:** Incorporating Lewis base functionality into spiro-OMeTAD structure for enhanced performance [(Xu et al., 2020)](https://consensus.app/papers/lewisbase-containing-hole-transporting-materials-xu/b6fa6c74f01550a4ae58aef3453cc36c/?utm_source=chatgpt). 7. **Amorphous Carbazole-Based HTM:** Demonstrated PCE of 16.5%, slightly lower than Spiro-OMeTAD, but promising due to low-cost synthesis [(Magomedov et al., 2017)](https://consensus.app/papers/holetransporting-material-based-22bissubstituted-magomedov/4ec7c1d6ea055a66b00e4e583c87a0d8/?utm_source=chatgpt). These alternatives highlight the ongoing research and development in finding more cost-effective and efficient materials for perovskite solar cells.